Crafting Design Tailored Solutions to User Problems.
A look into the redesigning of the New York Times app case study by Johny Vino
Photo by Brian McGowan on Unsplash
The New York Times is one of the most popular news sources in the world, with millions of readers across the globe. However, as with any app, there is always room for improvement. In this article, we’ll take a look at the three key things I learned from how Johny Vino and his team used the design thinking process to identify user needs and create a solution that addresses those needs. Access the full article here: Redesigning the New York Times app.
Design Thinking Process
To begin with, the design thinking process is a methodology used by designers to solve complex problems. It involves empathising with users, defining the problem, ideating solutions, prototyping, and testing. By following this process, designers can create solutions tailored to users’ needs and seamlessly integrate them into existing products.
In the New York Times app case study, designers used the design thinking process to identify user needs and create a feature that addresses those needs. The feature is called Timely and allows users to receive notifications at opportune moments throughout a busy day.
Design Principles
After researching and conducting user interviews, the team came up with a set of design principles to guide them while designing to maintain a direct and consistent relationship between the interview results and the design solution. This highlights the importance of a user-centric approach to addressing design problems. Rather than making drastic changes or overhauling the entire app, the proposal suggests making small changes that are tailored to user needs, creating a more seamless and intuitive experience for users. This highlights how small design changes can have a big impact on the user experience. It also recognises that understanding and meeting user needs is crucial for enhancing user satisfaction and loyalty.
The Timely Feature
The Timely feature was designed to provide users with quick reads at opportune moments throughout their day. This feature was based on user research and insights into user behaviour. With research and feedback, they were able to provide users with content that is tailored to their schedule and habits. This personalisation not only enhances the overall user experience but also addresses the issue of irrelevant content, which was identified as one of the reasons for user dissatisfaction with the app. The Timely feature did not require a complete overhaul of the existing app but rather subtle changes to the app.
Conclusion
This case study demonstrates how designers can use the design thinking process to create innovative solutions that address user needs. By focusing on user research and insights into user behaviour, designers can create features that are tailored to users’ needs and seamlessly integrate them into existing products. The Timely feature is an excellent example of how small design changes can have a big impact on the user experience. By providing users with content that is tailored to their schedules and habits, designers can create a more personalised experience for users.